For more general questions about Conscience, open science, and our other programs, please consult the General FAQ page.
Program Scope
How can I determine if my project falls within the DMOS program scope?
To evaluate whether your project aligns with the DMOS scope, consider the following questions:
- Does your project address an unmet medical need?
- Do you have a plan to make your therapeutic product affordable (for example, by following the cost-plus principle)?
- Do you have a strategy to ensure that the therapeutic product developed through this project will be globally accessible?
- Is your research at the preclinical or early to mid-clinical stage, within Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) 2–7?
- Does your project include at least one Canadian small or medium-sized enterprise (SME)?
- Do you have matching funds to cover the remaining project costs?
- Do you commit to Conscience’s Open Science Policy?
If you answered yes to all of the above questions, then your project is in scope. If you would like to discuss your project further, please feel free to reach out to us via email, and we would be happy to assist you.
What modalities are accepted besides small molecules?
We do not have a preference for any specific modality. Projects of all kinds can be submitted, and modality is not a factor in our selection criteria.
Is vaccine development included in the program’s scope?
Yes, vaccine development is within the scope of the program, provided that the vaccine targets an unmet medical need.
Are clinical trials included in the program’s scope?
Yes, DMOS supports projects at all stages of drug discovery and development from lead identification to early and mid-stage clinical projects. The maximum amount of funding that can be awarded varies according to the project’s Technology Readiness Level (TRL), up to a maximum of $2M for clinical-stage projects.
Is there a target number of projects per Technology Readiness Level (TRL) that you will fund?
No, there is no fixed number of projects per TRL that we plan to fund. The distribution of funds will depend on the number and quality of proposals received at each TRL.
| Project’s TRL Category | Maximum funding from DMOS per project |
| Lead identification (TRL 2-3) | $200,000 |
| Lead optimization (TRL 3-4) | $550,000 |
| IND enabling preclinical development (TRL 4-6) | $1,600,000 |
| Early to mid-stage (Phase 1-2) clinical projects (TRL 6-7) | $2,000,000** |
How can I determine the Technology Readiness Level of my project?
To determine the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of your project, refer to the following guidelines regarding the type of work associated with each TRL:
- TRL 2-3: Projects at this stage should have validated targets and developed cellular assays. The objective should be to identify (TRL2) and enhance (TRL3) the potency, selectivity, and cell permeability of compounds (i.e. “hits”) to produce one or more viable “lead” compounds. For these projects, activities include screening, in vitro assay, structure-activity relationship chemistry, in vitro toxicity analysis.
- TRL 3-4: This stage focuses on lead optimization. Projects should already have potent, cell-permeable, and selective lead compounds. The goal is to improve drug-like properties by modifying the lead compound series. For these projects, activities include medicinal chemistry, testing lead compounds in animal models, conducting Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (DMPK) studies, performing in vivo toxicity analysis, and selecting a candidate drug for further preclinical studies.
- TRL 4-6: Projects at this stage should have a drug candidate with an established pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile. The objective is to generate the preclinical data necessary for regulatory approval of clinical trials. This includes animal pharmacology, toxicology, and efficacy studies, as well as manufacturing data (formulation, stability, and processes) and conducting required toxicity and efficacy studies under Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) protocols, along with chemistry, manufacturing, and control (CMC) studies.
- TRL 6-7: These projects will seek to demonstrate clinical utility and feasibility in an appropriate operational environment and generate (i) human safety data and (ii) proof of concept for human efficacy. Such clinical studies can include dose-ranging and safety studies in healthy individuals, and small-scale efficacy studies in patients to determine therapeutic doses and report adverse events.
Eligibility
Are only Canadian SMEs eligible, or can foreign SMEs also participate?
At least one Canadian SME is required for eligibility. Foreign SMEs can participate as co-investigators or collaborators, but they cannot be the Principal Investigator. Please note that we can only fund a maximum of 5% of the total project cost outside of Canada. The rest of the funding must be spent within Canada.
What qualifies as an SME for this program?
For our program, an SME is an organization (for-profit or not-for-profit) registered in Canada with fewer than 500 paid employees.
Can the same organization participate in multiple LOIs?
Yes, an organization or applicant can submit several LOIs.
Is there a matchmaking service for academic applicants seeking a Canadian SME partner?
While we currently do not have a dedicated system for matchmaking, we recognize its importance and are actively working on it. In the meantime, applicants are encouraged to submit their applications and indicate their collaboration needs. We will do our best to help connect you with potential SME partners.
Where should we apply if we are located in Quebec and want matching funds from CQDM?
You can submit your Letter of Intent (LOI) to either CQDM or Conscience through our online grants management system. Please indicate in your LOI that you are seeking matching funds from CQDM, and we coordinate with them.
Application Process
What is the difference between a Principal Investigator, Co-Investigator and Collaborator in the DMOS application?
Below are the definitions for each role:
- Principal Investigator (PI): The researcher leading the project and receiving funding. If there is more than one PI, please designate one lead PI and refer to the others as Co-Investigators (Co-I).
- Co-Investigator (Co-I): Researcher(s) responsible for project activities and also receiving funding.
- Collaborator: Researcher(s) involved in the project but not receiving funding.
When will applicants be invited to submit full proposals, and when will the application forms be available?
After you submit your Letter of Intent (LOI), we will review it. If selected, you will receive a notification email, and when you log back into the online grants management system, you will see the full proposal application available to you. Please refer to the program overview for the deadlines relevant to the current funding round.
Financial Requirements and Matching Funds
Can other federal funds be used as matching funds?
In general, matching funds can come from any source as long as they are used to cover actual, incurred, and eligible expenses recorded in the recipient’s accounts. For SME applicants however, at least 25% of the total project cost must come from non-Canadian government sources. This 25% funds requirement does not apply to academic applicants.
Do all matching funds need to be secured at the time of application submission?
Matching funds must be secured by the full proposal submission deadline. Proof of secured matching funds is a mandatory requirement in the full proposal application, and the funds must be accessible by the start of the grant agreement. Note that Conscience will only cover 10-50% of the project cost. Since the Strategic Innovation Fund, which supports our program, operates as a reimbursement fund, recipients should be prepared to cover costs upfront with their own funds until reimbursement is processed.
Can expenses be eligible if incurred outside of Canada, such as when work cannot be done in Canada, or costs are substantially lower offshore?
Yes, however, only up to 5% of the total project cost can be allocated to eligible expenses incurred outside of Canada.
In the case of a consortium of participants:
a) Does each participant need to secure their own matching funds?
b) Can one participant with sufficient funds transfer funds to another participant for use as matching funds?
a) Yes, each participant must secure their own matching funds, as our program will only fund 10-50% of each participant’s budget.
b) Yes, a participant with sufficient funds can transfer funds to another participant who lacks resources, and the receiving participant can use those funds as matching funds.
Open Science and Intellectual Property
Does your Open Science Policy mean that the project molecule cannot be patented by any party? If not, who ultimately owns the intellectual property (IP)?
Conscience adopts an open science first approach and prefers projects that are fully open, meaning without patents. However, this does not automatically preclude patenting. Conscience may consider adapting its open science approach to accommodate specific scientific, technical, or commercial circumstances, for example where there is a pre-existing patent to the therapy or where co-funders require traditional intellectual property arrangements. This is only done where the project continues to align with Conscience’s goal of enabling available and affordable therapeutic interventions.
In such cases, Conscience may permit limited intellectual property rights, including patents or trade secrets, where these are reasonably necessary to ensure that medicines reach patients. Any such exceptions must be justified by the applicant, are assessed on a case by case basis, and are structured to maintain maximal openness across project outputs. Applicants are expected to clearly justify any departure from full openness.
What is your value proposition for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that rely on patents and IP for their viability in today’s market?
The value proposition for SMEs can vary significantly based on their business model, assets, and target indications. For SMEs successfully securing risk capital from investors, the current patent system effectively supports their endeavors, indicating a well-functioning market.However, for SMEs facing challenges in securing investment, our collaborative program offers significant advantages. SMEs with specialized expertise or technological platforms can receive funding for specific projects, while sharing data through the program can increase their visibility and potentially open doors for further funding opportunities.
For SMEs with project molecules deemed less attractive by investors (e.g. due to lower expected returns), our program provides an alternative path to drug development, for example by leveraging regulatory exclusivities, which can still lead to commercialization.
We encourage applicants to review Conscience’s Guiding Principles to better understand how we approach intellectual property and open science across different project and business contexts.
I have a molecule but lack experience with data sharing. Can I get support from Conscience?
Absolutely! At Conscience, we take a collaborative approach to grants management and work closely with our grantees throughout the project. We help our grantees adhere to our Open Science Policy by assisting them in finding suitable repositories and developing an Output Management and Sharing Plan that will be made publicly accessible no later than the end of the project. This Plan will list all output types generated through the project, provide details about where and how the grantee will share them, and the conditions under which they can be reused.
I have questions about how the Open Science Policy may affect my existing intellectual property and any future IP from my project. Who can I speak with privately?
We encourage you to review our Open Science Policy If you still have questions, please contact our Senio Program Manager for Drug Discovery and Development, Resham Chhabra, at [email protected].
What if I develop new software, materials, or methods while the project is ongoing that is outside the scope of the funded project? Can I have IP rights in those?
Yes. Our Open Science Policy only extends to the project molecules, project data, any methods or materials created for the purpose of completing a DMOS project, and methods or materials that are practically necessary to use the project molecules and data. If you develop new materials or methods for a purpose other than the completion of a DMOS project you may protect them as you wish. However, complying with this policy means that if those new methods or materials are used in the DMOS project and are needed to replicate results, full descriptions must be shared publicly in accordance with the Output Management and Sharing Plan, which may have implications on efforts to obtain or enforce intellectual property rights.
DMOS projects are supported by funds from Innovation, Science, and Economic Development (Canada). Under Conscience’s agreement with ISED, there are restrictions concerning how IP can be sold and licenced, including a requirement to obtain approval before selling it outside of Canada for 5 years and around granting exclusive licenses. Any IP created to complete a project that is outside the scope of this policy will be subject to those restrictions. Failure to comply with this policy may result in a requirement to return all project funding to Conscience. Finally, the secrecy required to obtain a patent may prevent you from sharing information that could lead to useful outside input and hinder collaboration.
After the end of the project, can I patent further advancements on molecules developed during a DMOS-supported project?
Yes, you or anyone else is fully free to patent later advances or alterations to Project Molecules. Whether such advances qualify for patent protection, or whether such protection is advisable, is a business decision you must make. Obtaining such a patent may, however, prevent you from obtaining further funds under the DMOS program.